Being a journalist under the autocratic rule of Libyan dictator Moammar Qadhafi was an exercise in choice: between promoting state propaganda and spending time in jail. Now that NATO has toppled the regime, Libya is a little better at letting reporters practice their trade. But the press in Libya is by no means free.<\/p>\n
That\u2019s according to human rights watchdog Freedom House, which has just released its latest annual survey of press freedom around the world. While the group says that media in Libya has clearly improved after Qadhafi, the watchdog\u2019s report describes a country where armed groups have taken to intimidating journalists while independent media has gone into retreat. All the while, a new legislature professes to be for freedom of the press \u2014 but has attempted to limit it.<\/p>\n
Though it\u2019s not all bad news. Freedom House\u2019s practice involves analyzing the legal, political and economic factors of each country, and then assigning them numerical values totaling a maximum of 100 points, which is the worst possible ranking. Since the collapse of the Qadhafi regime \u2014 and the autocrat\u2019s death in 2011 \u2014 Libya\u2019s rankings have improved in all three categories. A total score of 94 in 2010 when Qadhafi was in charge, which the group termed \u201cNot Free\u201d and \u201camong the most tightly controlled in the world,\u201d has dropped 35 points to a total of 59, or \u201cPartly Free.\u201d<\/p>\n
The reason for the relative improvement might be best summed up as instability at least being better than Qadhafi. The United States and NATO helped overthrow the dictator in part to build a more open Libya. But it\u2019s still not free, though. Or even mostly. Journalists have been arbitrarily arrested. Arbitrary imprisonment is still widespread, according to Human Rights Watch, which has documented attacks \u2014 including torture and rape \u2014 on villagers deemed disloyal.<\/p>\n
Michael Hanna, who studies the region at The Century Foundation, says it\u2019s important to remember where Libya came from. \u201cThe state does not have a monopoly of violence and does not control many of the militias that are still enforcing security,\u201d Hanna tells Danger Room. \u201cYou do have a sort of mixed picture. But when looking at the baseline that is the Qadhafi era, it\u2019s hard to look at that without seeing marked improvement despite all the setbacks and legal uncertainties.\u201d<\/p>\n