Connecticut is poised to become the first state to require labeling of genetically engineered food \u2014 in theory, at least.<\/p>\n
On Monday, the state House of Representatives passed an amended version of a labeling bill that the state Senate approved two weeks ago, and Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) has said he\u2019ll sign it. The bipartisan bill passed unanimously in the Senate and 134-to-3 in the House, with little debate in either chamber \u2014 a major contrast to California\u2019s contentious GMO-labeling ballot initiative that ultimately failed last year. Differences between the two states aside, it goes to show you how much more difficult passing such progressive measures becomes once corporate money and gullible voters are involved.<\/p>\n
The Hartford Courant\u2019s political blog reports that \u201cImmediately after the vote, cheers could be heard outside the Hall of the House from advocates who had been pushing the labeling requirement.\u201d The bill\u2019s success is certainly an important victory for the GMO-labeling movement, which seems to have been motivated, not discouraged, by last year\u2019s loss in California. Thirty-seven labeling proposals have been introduced in 21 states so far this year.<\/p>\n
But the final version of the Connecticut bill includes quite a crucial catch: The labeling requirement won\u2019t actually go into effect until similar legislation is passed by at least four other states, one of which borders Connecticut. Also, the labeling adopters must include Northeast states with an aggregate population of at least 20 million. So if, say, New York passed a labeling law, that would help a lot, as New York borders Connecticut and has a population of 19.5 million, which, combined with Connecticut\u2019s 3.5 million, easily passes the population target.<\/p>\n