May 23 2013
Counterpunch: Colombia’s Peasants and Workers Under Fire
There has been an alarming escalation of repression against rural populations in Colombia. Much of this is focused against the National Unified Federation of Agricultural Workers Unions, or Fensuagro–the country’s largest labor organization representing rural workers. Fensuagro is doubly targeted not only because of the peasant farmers and workers it represents, but because it is the most prominent union in the Marcha Patriótica (Patriotic March), a social movement demanding meaningful land reform, an open and safe climate for the political opposition, unionists and human rights advocates, and popular participation in the nation’s peace process.
Repression has also been high in rural settings for unions such as the Colombian Federation of Educators, or Fecode, and for human rights defenders. It is troubling that this overlaps with the current peace process and with more than two years of the Labor Action Plan (LAP). The LAP was enacted in April 2011, calling on the Colombian government to fulfill a series of commitments in order for the US-Colombia Free Trade Agreement to be passed. Only one month later, in May, 2011, the US Trade Representative’s office announced ahead of schedule that the Colombian government had fulfilled these commitments and the FTA went into full effect.
The rising repression seems to be motivated by two primary factors: 1) the desire of the Colombian oligarchy and transnational corporate interests to augment and consolidate the appropriation of peasant land in the event of a successful peace process and land reform; and, 2) an attempt to prevent the emergence of a strong Left political bloc.
The reality for rural workers has not been one of improved labor or basic human rights. Besides the repression against labor organizers and human rights advocates, forced displacement has increased by 83% over the past year according to CODHES (the Consultancy on Human Rights and Displacement). Colombia already has the world’s highest number of internally displaced, as many as 6 million, and more than 60% of these are from farming communities. Also hard hit are indigenous and Afro-Colombian communities, with Afro-Colombians disproportionately affected the past year. Of course, farming communities can also be indigenous or Afro-Colombian, so there is much overlap.
Peasant farmers provide 70% of the food that Colombians eat. But over the past 15 years of Plan Colombia, the US and Colombia’s “war plan”, Colombians have been dispossessed of 20 million hectares of land and half the country’s land is now in the hands of 1% of the population, , according to Virginia Bouvier of the United States Institute of Peace. If one looks at the places where farmers are displaced from, without exception the areas are in or near sites wanted for the development of extractive industries, hydroelectric projects built for the export of electricity, or big agribusinesses with operations carried out by foreign corporations.
Click here for the full story.
One Response to “Counterpunch: Colombia’s Peasants and Workers Under Fire”
Your euphemistic misinterpretation of US involvement in Colombia as a “war plan” is incorrect. You build an incorrect correlation between US involvement and displaced farmers. In truth, US involvement is helping to stymie the real human rights violators – the FARC. The idea that “transnational corporations” are appropriating peasant land and repressing rural workers is a fallacy. The campesinos that have moved away from their fincas are doing so because they are unable to pay the FARC taxes, unwilling to grow illegal crops that put their families and health at risk, and no longer willing to tolerate the violence imposed on them by the “left political bloc”.
If you look closely at the places where farmers are being displaced, it is in the places with the highest FARC activity. In places where “collar bombs” are placed on kidnapped teachers. In places where the men are given the option of being executed, or taking up arms alongside the FARC. Your article plays on the guilty conscious of an American reader, and points the finger at the “government” and some ubiquitous super-company devoid of any moral obligation. Yet this “government” is of the people of Colombia, a people that staunchly oppose the true criminals of displacement and injustice – the FARC. Your anti-commercial, dystopian image is ignoring the true instigators, and leveraging an inaccurate, sympathetic perspective.
You create many false attributions in your article. Deaths are misconstrued as “assassinations”, and an underlying theme of injustice is connected to aristocrats and “the government”. I believe that your article draws attention away from the true problems in Colombia, and is damaging in that it blames the forces that are seeking to help.